What do I need to know about ... Discursive Writing?
What's the point?
Discursive wirting discusses the situation at hand. It
presents an argument in a more balanced way than argumentative and
persuasive writing and can appreciate the arguments both for and against
a given position. Discursive writing does not argue for or against a
point throughout the essay. After having assessed and evaluated all
arguments, the writer generally states his/her opinion at the end.
What are the conventions?
Examples of conventions that could be used in a discursive essays are
listed below. However, you have to be careful when using them that you
do not become to strongly persuasive:
- Balanced and calm tone of voice
- A structure that alternates between the two opposiing positions exploring each one
- A balanced consideration of the evidence for each point and an analysis of the strengths and flaws of that evidence
- Techincal and formal language where appropriate
- Reference to other sources of expertise / quotations from famous thinkers
- Connectives
to link paragraphs together by pointing out similarites (Equally,
Similarly, etc) or differences (On the other hand, However, etc)
- Some
persuasive techniques: hyperbole, repetition, oxymoron, triads, emotive
language, imagery, similes, metaphors, rhetorical questions (although
be careful when using all of these that you do not become too strongly
persuasive
Structure
Introdution: This states clearly the problem of the investigation and why it is a significant issue.
Main Body: Consider the various sides of the position in turn,
alternative between them. Assess each one and compare their relative
strengths - do not include your own opinion at this point. For each
point, use a new paragraph. Begin each paragraph with a key sentence
which links back to the question.
Conclusion: Summing up the your key points and state your
position again and what has made it difficult to come to this decision /
whether there are any qualifications or uncertainties involved
Hints and Tips
- use the TENNIS MATCH ARGUMENT STYLE or an alternating structure to make it interesting
- Before
you start writing your discursive essay any essay you should start with
a SPIDER DIAGRAM- this is a really good way to put your ideas down to
help you plan your essay. Also, you should know before writing your
essay which side of the argument you are on (For or against). This is to
avoid mistakes and confusion.
- Argument phrases: to introduce points and make it clear
Against:
- “Some people believe/ think/ feel that…”
- “Some people may argue”
- "Others are of the opinion that...".
- “While some people may claim”
- “Furthermore some people may insist”
- “Although some people would have us believe”
For:
- However, In contrast, On the other hand, Nevertheless
- “While in the case that…”
- “Further consideration, however, suggests…”
- “Despite the fact that there is some truth in…”
- “Although there is some evidence to support…”
- "It is also argued that...”
- "However there are also strong arguments against this point of view..."
- "Another counter argument is that..."
Do's
- Should choose 4-6 main points (hopefully a balance of for and against)
- Use
connectives- furthermore, moreover, in addition, additionally,
similarly etc. On the other hand, conversely, however, in contrast etc.
- Look at both points of view, and end with your own opinion.
- The
different points, for and against, should be ALWAYS separated, NOT
mixed. Present the “For” points in a separate paragraph, and present the
“Against” point in another separate paragraph keep alternating between
the two.
- The introduction should be balanced and serve just to introduce the topic.
- The conclusion can be persuasive
- Make examples as specific as possible
Dont's
- Use informal language when you are writing an essay, because you may be penalised in the exam
- Forget that there are 3 different parts of a discursive essay: Introduction, Main Part and a Conclusion.
- Forget to consider both sides - this is a persuasive essay, so you don't have to pick just one
Example Questions
- Should boxing be banned?
- Should students wear school uniforms?
- Should kids be banned from watching violent movies?
- Should animal experimenting be banned?
Example Answer:
Animal Experiments
A
subject which always arouses strong feelings on both sides of the
argument is the use of animals in medical research. I believe that,
though this may have been necessary in the past, other ways can be
developed to test drugs and, in the future, animals should not be used.
One of my main reasons
for saying this is that living tissues can be grown in test tubes and
new drugs can be tested on these. Computers can also be programmed to
show how medicines will react in the human body.
Moreover, animals are not always like humans. They do
not suffer from all human diseases, so scientists have to give them the
illnesses artificially. The joints in rabbit legs are inflamed with
chemicals to help research in rheumatism. These tests do not always work
because animals do not react to drugs in the same way as humans.
Aspirin, for example, damages pregnant mice and dogs, but not pregnant
women. Arsenic, which is a deadly poison for humans, has no effect on
sheep, while penicillin, which is so valuable to humans, kills guinea
pigs.
In addition, I believe that animal
experiments should not be used because of the unnecessary pain that they
cause to animals. The government introduced new rules about the use of
animals in experiments in 1986. Scientists claim that these rules
safeguard animals because they state that discomfort must be kept to a
minimum and that painkillers must be used where necessary and
appropriate. Surely this means, however, that scientists can still
decide not to use painkillers in the animal experiments because they do
not consider them appropriate. The British Union against Vivisection
claims that 75% of animals experimented on are given no anaesthetic.
In spite of the claims of some scientists about the effectiveness of
animal research, the death rate in this country has stayed the same over
the last thirty years. There is also more long-term sickness, even
though greater numbers of animals are being used in research.
On the other hand, scientists claim that some
experiments are so small, for example giving an injection, that
painkillers are not needed. They also argue that experiments on animals
have been very useful in the past. For instance, the lives of ten
million human diabetics have been saved because of experiments with
insulin on dogs. Dogs also benefited, as the same drug can be used on
them. In fact, a third of medicines used by vets are the same as those
used by doctors.
It is argued by researchers that the use of animals in
experiments cannot be replaced by methods using living tissue which has
been grown in test tubes. These tests do not show how the drugs work on
whole animals and so they only have limited effectiveness.
Although
I accept that some drugs can be used on animals and humans, this does
not mean that they have to be tested on animals in the first place when
alternative methods are available. Alternative methods do work. Various
groups have been set up to put money into other ways of researching. For
example the Dr. Hadwen Trust has shown how human cartilage can be grown
in test tubes to study rheumatism. Similar research is being done into
cancer and multiple sclerosis. Tests can be done on bacteria to see
whether a chemical will cause cancer. There is even a programme of
volunteer human researchers, where people suffering from illnesses offer
to help in research.
In conclusion, I accept that animal
experiments have brought great benefits in the past, but now money needs
to be spent on developing other methods of testing drugs and medical
procedures, so that the use of animals can be phased out altogether.
Reference: - http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/education/bitesize/standard/english/writing/discursive_writing_rev3.shtml
LINK TO EXERCISES
